Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tivoli Pond


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. (non-admin closure) B  music  ian  03:36, 15 February 2012 (UTC)

Tivoli Pond

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Seems insufficient as a standalone article unlikely to get larger than a stub. I'd suggest that it be merged with the Tivoli Park article (there's enough material here for a subheading and a paragraph); I'll take care of moving the content over, but that will leave a redundant stub. Tyrenon (talk) 21:29, 8 February 2012 (UTC)
 * Ok, the information has been transferred, so now this is a redundant article on a pond within a city park.Tyrenon (talk) 21:38, 8 February 2012 (UTC)

Keep. The pond is covered in depth by multiple reliable sources: (and others). If it is to be merged, there's at least as much reason to merge it to Tivoli–Rožnik–Šiška Hill Landscape Park (yet to be created), of which it is part, than to merge it to Tivoli Park. I think it is best to keep it as a stand-alone article and expand it with the material from the provided references. --Eleassar my talk 22:30, 8 February 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Slovenia-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 23:48, 8 February 2012 (UTC)
 * Some additional sources:
 * Articles:, , , , , , , , ,
 * Books:, , ,
 * --Eleassar my talk 09:46, 9 February 2012 (UTC)

Keep. The pond has an interesting social history in Ljubljana and the article can be developed further with this. It is featured on many old Ljubljana postcards, and it would be interesting to include some of these. It also appears in some works of literature (e.g., Mile Pavlin's Spomladanski mraz: roman; Bogdan Novak's Tiha zaobljuba), which could be further explored, and it played some role in the ethnic history of the city (e.g., hosting the Laibacher Eislaufferein). Doremo (talk) 04:35, 9 February 2012 (UTC)
 * Keep, there are many sources available and as said above, it has its own story to tell. --Tone 10:06, 9 February 2012 (UTC)
 * Keep. I can see where the nominator is coming from, but I think this is sufficiently notable to be kept. -- Necrothesp (talk) 14:15, 13 February 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.