Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/To'ak Chocolate


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep. I'm withdrawing this, and will instead propose a merge.  DGG ( talk ) 06:03, 28 October 2017 (UTC)

To'ak Chocolate

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Advertising for a chocolate bar/ Unaccountably, a G11 speedy was removed. There's no point in even thinking about notability when the article violates WP BOTPRONote: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. North America1000 04:54, 28 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Food and drink-related deletion discussions. North America1000 04:54, 28 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ecuador-related deletion discussions. North America1000 04:55, 28 October 2017 (UTC)


 * Keep – Passes WP:GNG and WP:AUD as per sources in the article. The article  does not  use promotional language, peacock language, or extol the benefits of the company, and does not encourage readers to do business with it. In other words, this article is not providing any form of advertising . Rather, the article provides a neutral overview about this notable company, again, based only upon what reliable sources state. Furthermore, this company has received ongoing news coverage from 2014 through 2017. This article also documents matters regarding the very rare Nacional cocoa bean variety that was previously thought to be extinct. I was still working on the article while this nomination occurred, but now I will wait. See the article talk page regarding the WP:DYK nomination I created for the article too. North America1000 04:56, 28 October 2017 (UTC)
 * the variety of bean is notable, and we have a separate article on it. We could redirect this, perhaps.  DGG ( talk ) 05:52, 28 October 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.