Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/To.get.her


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) ––FormalDude (talk)  13:22, 19 December 2022 (UTC)

To.get.her

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Fails WP:NFILM. ––FormalDude (talk)  14:42, 18 December 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Film and United States of America. ––FormalDude  (talk)  14:42, 18 December 2022 (UTC)
 * Keep: Passes both GNG and NFILM through reviews in Paste, The Hollywood Reporter and Variety. Somebodyidkfkdt (talk) 14:58, 18 December 2022 (UTC)
 * Keep Reviews from Variety and Hollywood Reporter is enough to pass WP:NFILM Donald D23   talk to me  19:47, 18 December 2022 (UTC)
 * Keep seems to be good enough with existing sourcing but the LA Times did a decent size write up of the director/movie as part of their Sundance coverage https://www.newspapers.com/clip/114821267/ and there's "local" coverage (from where it was filmed) which is still reliable and significant: https://www.starnewsonline.com/story/news/2011/01/31/sundance-audience-gets-local-film-together/30852253007/, https://www.starnewsonline.com/story/news/2011/01/19/wilmington-brshot-film-to-screen-at-sundance-film-festival/30851220007/, and https://www.starnewsonline.com/story/news/2013/01/11/locally-made-teen-drama-to-be-released/30930620007/ (this one from ~2 years after its Sundance premier when it was finally released digitally, there's additional PR-y articles mentioning its release as part of a Sundance package but this one is focused on this movie. I've added information from this source to the article.) Skynxnex (talk) 20:03, 18 December 2022 (UTC)
 * This does not, by itself meet WP:NFILM#3 (the coverage does), but it also won the Sundance "Best of NEXT Audience Award" (I've added explicit text and another cite for it, although some of the reviews mentioned it) and the vast majority of films that have won it or an equivalent award have articles which gives some additional evidence it's likely notable. (See and List of Sundance Film Festival award winners, where it seems to have been a WP:REDYES link since 2011. Skynxnex (talk) 20:15, 18 December 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of North Carolina-related deletion discussions. Skynxnex (talk) 20:43, 18 December 2022 (UTC)
 * Keep I don't find any critical reviews, but those given above seem ok for FILM. Oaktree b (talk) 23:27, 18 December 2022 (UTC)
 * Keep. The three critical reviews from Paste, Hollywood Reporter, and Variety appear to be WP:RS, while Variety leans on the shorter side and is borderline WP:SIGCOV, overall WP:GNG is met. Hollywood Reporter, Paste (magazine), and Variety (magazine) are prominent film-focused magazines, so the critics could potentially be nationally well known and might also meet WP:NFILM criteria 1 though this is more debatable. The deleting rationale is also unclear.  VickKiang  (talk)  01:38, 19 December 2022 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.