Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/To Eliminate The Opiate (book)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Marvin Stuart Antelman. Eddie891 Talk Work 17:54, 30 August 2022 (UTC)

To Eliminate The Opiate (book)

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Notability. Can't see anything to establish it; all the google hits are, apart from Amazon, booksellers TheLongTone (talk) 14:45, 23 August 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 14:48, 23 August 2022 (UTC)
 * Nota also that there is a Wikipedia article on the author of this book, created by the author of this article, which has been tagged as possibly about a non-notable subject.TheLongTone (talk) 14:54, 23 August 2022 (UTC)


 * Redirect to Marvin Stuart Antelman or delete. I couldn't find much more than occasional mentions in conspiracy-minded unreliable sources—there's none of the in-depth RS coverage needed to satisfy WP:NBOOK or the GNG. I'm not sure Antelman is notable either, but as long as his article is there redirecting as an alternative to deletion is probably harmless (though I'm not averse to deleting outright). Extraordinary Writ (talk) 22:57, 23 August 2022 (UTC)
 * Keep Notability has been much improved now, and has been tagged "in progress" as well Nissimnanach (talk) 17:49, 24 August 2022 (UTC)Nissimnanach
 * Redirect to Marvin Stuart Antelman - The sourcing in the article does not have any reliable sources that contribute to establishing notability, nor can I find any. -- Whpq (talk) 02:57, 25 August 2022 (UTC)
 * Redirect to Marvin Stuart Antelman. The current refs fail WP:GNG nor WP:NBOOK, relying upon a bundle of SPS, including YouTube, Reddit, threads, and other forums. Given the lack of any RS, there's nothing worth preserving by merging, but WP:ATD also suggests redirecting is better than deleting, IMO. I could go with draftify as well, perhaps, as the article is newly created, but I don't feel the topic is even notable enough. Many thanks! VickKiang (talk) 11:15, 26 August 2022 (UTC)
 * Keep or Redirect I'm fine with either per above. Deletion is unnecessary. Buffs (talk) 15:29, 29 August 2022 (UTC)
 * What policy or guideline does this meet that justifies a keep? Whpq (talk) 16:30, 29 August 2022 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.