Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/To Inflict


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Spartaz Humbug! 19:09, 1 March 2018 (UTC)

To Inflict

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Non-notable short film lacking in-depth, non-trivial support. Fails WP:NOTFILM. red dogsix (talk) 20:11, 21 February 2018 (UTC)


 * Keep - Initially To Inflict had 2 verifiable sources that were of course older from 2013 and retrieved last on 2013-09-08. One of the sources showed "To Inflict" as a notable story on the Indie Fest USA website. Being 5 years later now there is no longer a mention of the film because the website updated their latest films for their last festivals and the upcoming festival — Preceding unsigned comment added by Techform (talk • contribs)


 * Comment - Unfortunately none of the "references" provided are in-depth or non-trivial. Just because the article meets the "Other evidence of notability" section of WP:NOTFILM, it does not mean it is automatically notable.  The section states," These criteria are presented as rules of thumb for easily identifying films that Wikipedia should probably have articles about. In almost all cases, a thorough search for independent, third-party reliable sources will be successful for a film meeting one or more of these criteria. However, meeting these criteria is not an absolute guarantee that Wikipedia should have a separate, stand-alone article entirely dedicated to the film."  Where is the Indie Fest USA story?   red dogsix (talk) 21:47, 21 February 2018 (UTC)


 * Comment And those sources, even if they were in-depth, do not match what the Other Evidence listing calls for, as none of them were published 5 years after release. --Nat Gertler (talk) 22:03, 21 February 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete - no sign of meeting WP:NOTFILM, per nominator. The "two added sources" are a one-sentence mention in an article, which does not convey significant notability, and a database listing, also not indicative of notability. Digging up the IndieFest page that was linked to via archives, I am not seeing mention of this film, much less in-depth coverage. There's no there there. --Nat Gertler (talk) 22:01, 21 February 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk &bull;&#32;mail) 00:58, 22 February 2018 (UTC)


 * Delete The film is little known, thus failing WP:NFILM and WP:GNG. The obscurity of this subject warrants consideration of WP:COI. Jack N. Stock (talk) 06:25, 22 February 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions.  Ivec os  (t) 17:44, 23 February 2018 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.