Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/To Love Somebody (2014 British film)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Deor (talk) 17:12, 18 June 2016 (UTC)

To Love Somebody (2014 British film)

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Non notable film. Reviews are not from reliable sources, not from "nationally known critics". None of it's awards are major. Part of an attempt to use Wikipedia for promotion. duffbeerforme (talk) 11:04, 1 June 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 20:09, 1 June 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 20:09, 1 June 2016 (UTC)


 * Delete. There are about 50 hits on Google for, and none of them look reliable.  The citations in the article to blogs and IMDb trivia.  The best I can find is this database entry at British Council, which only proves that the film exists. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 20:19, 1 June 2016 (UTC)


 * expand:


 * Comment: Girls On Film, London looks okay enough, but the various film-related blogs need to be evaluated, as while some may not be, some just might be fine.  Schmidt,  Michael Q. 06:48, 2 June 2016 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Comment: Award mentions at Indiefest Film awards and Maverick Movie Awards have been returned to page. Both institutions are fairly well established as reliable sources. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Happybunny58592 (talk • contribs) 07:55, 6 June 2016 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 09:20, 8 June 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete - fails GNG. --Tagishsimon (talk) 21:57, 12 June 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete at best for now as I have evaluated the article and its sources and at best there's nothing solidly convincing thus delete for now. This can be Drafted if ever needed later. SwisterTwister   talk  17:39, 16 June 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.