Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/To The New


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 22:08, 25 May 2017 (UTC)

To The New

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

not notable. the refs are mentionsand press releases, and from the description of the company, there is no reason to expect better.  DGG ( talk ) 06:34, 18 May 2017 (UTC) �  DGG ( talk ) 06:34, 18 May 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete. A week ago I spent time reviewing the existing references, found that most were interviews and tagged them accordingly. I tagged the page as possibly not meeting notability guidelines and started a conversation on the talk page outlining my concerns. I also did a quick Google search for the author's name which revealed unambiguously in the first couple of results their relationship with the company. The article is self-published. So far, there's been no declaration of COI from the author, and the author has not replied to my comments on the talk page despite clearly knowing what one is for. Since a week has passed and there's been no sign of effort to improve the issues with the article that I have flagged, I support deletion. Curb Safe Charmer (talk) 07:56, 18 May 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions.   CAPTAIN RAJU  (✉)   11:13, 18 May 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions.   CAPTAIN RAJU  (✉)   11:13, 18 May 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions.   CAPTAIN RAJU  (✉)   11:13, 18 May 2017 (UTC)


 * Delete. Non-notable commercial blurb. Xxanthippe (talk) 11:34, 18 May 2017 (UTC).
 * Delete Fails WP:CORPDEPTH and GNG. -- HighKing ++ 16:58, 18 May 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete: fails WP:GNG. --Guy Macon (talk) 06:53, 19 May 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.