Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/To The Top Canada Expedition


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Cirt (talk) 04:08, 1 September 2009 (UTC)

To The Top Canada Expedition

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

This article promotes a website and a person. Both fail notability requirements. Google News has no matches to "TO THE TOP CANADA EXPEDITION" and matches to correct "Chris Robertson" all appear to be promotional articles for the website. If the inspirational book is of interest then that may require an article rather than this expedition (referring to the only Google Books match "Chicken Soup for the Canadian Soul" if Chicken Soup for the Soul is not already enough). Ash (talk) 17:15, 18 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Is the guy notable? Maybe the article could be stubbed and renamed for him, if there is a lot of press coverage of his project. Dmz5  *Edits**Talk* 22:13, 18 August 2009 (UTC)
 * No, he's only known in the press for this Expedition.—Ash (talk) 22:17, 18 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Well, if he is known in the press, even if just for this expedition, maybe he is notable after all? Lots of people are known for just one thing.  Dmz5  *Edits**Talk* 22:25, 18 August 2009 (UTC)
 * This Google News search shows 4 mentions in the press in an 11 year period. His notability is poor as his expedition is unlikely to be considered an "enduring historical record" and certainly not notable outside of Canada. The sources available make no mention of him winning any awards.—Ash (talk) 22:40, 18 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Fair enough! Dmz5  *Edits**Talk* 22:42, 18 August 2009 (UTC)

 Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, – Juliancolton  &#124; Talk 00:25, 25 August 2009 (UTC)
 * I stubbed it. I don't want to endorse deleting it, but it needs work at least.  Dmz5  *Edits**Talk* 22:47, 18 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete. No evidence of notability. All I can find are websites by the person in question Little Professor (talk) 00:29, 25 August 2009 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.


 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions.  -- Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:49, 25 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete - No reference to any notability of the project or the person. Taymaishu (talk) 07:17, 27 August 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.