Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/To peen


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was Speedy delete, complete nonsense. Guy 23:56, 7 November 2006 (UTC)

To peen


This is a straightforward dictionary definition, and as such inappropriate per WP:NOT. It also seem to be of dubious notability: the Google hits for "To peen" all point elsewhere, and the Ghits for "To peen flirt" aren't exactly promising. Even without notability concerns, this is just a straightforward dicdef. Moreschi 21:02, 7 November 2006 (UTC)


 * Delete, WP:NOT a dictionary. Is this in Wikitionary? -- Shrieking Harpy  [[Image:Gay_flag.svg|17px]] TalkundefinedCount 21:26, 7 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete non-notable neologism, or might I say protologism? Mak (talk)  21:31, 7 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Merge into existing article on London slang if applicable — Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.42.65.200 (talk • contribs)
 * Delete, Wikipedia is not a dictionary, especially urban dictionary. --  ßott  e   siηi  (talk) 22:57, 7 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per above. WP:NOT. --Brad Beattie (talk) 23:27, 7 November 2006 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.