Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/To the Rats and Wolves


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete.  Sandstein  09:09, 6 August 2016 (UTC)

To the Rats and Wolves

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Band with no substantive claim to passing WP:NMUSIC and no evidence of any substantive reliable source coverage to get them over WP:GNG: the substance boils down to "this is a band that exists and released its debut album in February 2016, the end", and the sourcing consists of one blurb on a blog. This is not enough to get a band into Wikipedia. Delete. Bearcat (talk) 22:11, 8 July 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. Bearcat (talk) 22:12, 8 July 2016 (UTC)


 * Weak Keep. The German wiki page for the band list a number of sources. Will tag the page accordingly. Karst (talk) 13:00, 9 July 2016 (UTC)
 * Even there, what I'm seeing is a lot of blogs and primary sourcing to their own press kit — I'm not seeing a whole lot of properly reliable source coverage. Bearcat (talk) 19:01, 11 July 2016 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 10:54, 15 July 2016 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, &mdash; Music1201  talk  00:38, 22 July 2016 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Relisting comment: final relist  Anarchyte  ( work  &#124;  talk )   07:32, 29 July 2016 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  Anarchyte  ( work  &#124;  talk )   07:32, 29 July 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete no evidence of meeting any criteria in WP:MUSICBIO. LibStar (talk) 08:20, 29 July 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Germany-related deletion discussions. North America1000 02:40, 31 July 2016 (UTC)


 * Delete -- nothing suggests notability. It may get more coverage in Germany; but it does not automatically make the subject notable in the En wiki. K.e.coffman (talk) 05:04, 6 August 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.