Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Toad Kart


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. No obection to recreating a redirect if anyone really wants to, but nothing in mainspace links to this article. Courcelles 04:01, 10 August 2010 (UTC)

Toad Kart

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

poorly referenced. little indication of notability. Marcus  Qwertyus   22:46, 3 August 2010 (UTC)


 * Delete per nom due to lack of sourcing and lack of notability.  JBsupreme  ( talk ) ✄ ✄ ✄	 22:48, 3 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete references are primary or open wikis. Doesn't cut it for notability. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • (Many otters • One bat • One hammer) 23:09, 3 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete I was unable to find references for the subject, fails to meet WP:GNG. --Odie5533 (talk) 23:13, 3 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Redirect to Mario Kart. It's a well-written article, but for starters, I find no proof that that's even the name of the vehicle (if it has a name at all). And as far as sources, well, Hammer hit the nail on the head (pun intended). Speaking of the kart, I don't even think Mario Kart racing vehicle is a notable template, so I'm going to nominate it for deletion. Erpert (let's talk about it) 06:52, 4 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Done. Erpert (let's talk about it) 07:03, 4 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of video game related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 16:39, 4 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 16:39, 4 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Merge this and similar articles to a List of Mario Kart series vehicles. Jclemens (talk) 16:48, 4 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete I don't think any kart in the series would be independently notable. This one certainly isn't. Reach Out to the Truth 16:57, 4 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Redirect - viable search term, but not independently notable. Marasmusine (talk) 13:03, 7 August 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.