Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Toaster Labs


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. &spades;PMC&spades; (talk) 23:44, 8 March 2017 (UTC)

Toaster Labs

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Only source may be created by someone affiliated with the subject. Google results revolve around linkedin and PR newswire. I dream of horses (My talk page) (My edits) @ 00:34, 1 March 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 01:42, 1 March 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Washington-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 01:42, 1 March 2017 (UTC)


 * Delete as spam. I could not find any non-PR sources. K.e.coffman (talk) 01:51, 1 March 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete SPAM and GNG. South Nashua (talk) 03:40, 1 March 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete "renowned sexologist"? The trademark symbols are a give-away. Perhaps speedy. Created by single-purpose account Erickmn9 who only edited that one day. W Nowicki (talk) 22:21, 1 March 2017 (UTC)
 * keep looks exactly like the clarisonic page referenced on the talk page, why keep that one but delete this? Doesn't seem consistent. ForestBecca (talk) 21:48, 2 March 2017 (UTC)
 * — ForestBecca (talk&#32;• contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.


 * Keep Agreed with ForestBecca, if we delete this then why not delete all others like it? This discussion makes wiki very hypocritical. Lexiseattle (talk) 21:50, 2 March 2017 (UTC)
 * — Lexiseattle (talk&#32;• contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.


 * Delete no coverage in indepenent sources. Article is obvious use of Wikipedia for marketing by editors who are not here to build an encyclopedia. --Dennis Bratland (talk) 22:08, 2 March 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete - borderline speedy deletion case (as pure advertising). No claim to notability and no significant coverage in independent sources. --bonadea contributions talk 22:19, 2 March 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.