Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tobias Hayek


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   Delete.  Jerry  delusional ¤ kangaroo 23:38, 5 September 2008 (UTC)

Tobias Hayek

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Another non-notable porn actor who doesn't pass WP:PORNBIO. A ni  Mate  08:34, 30 August 2008 (UTC) 
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and actresses-related deletion discussions.   --  Fabrictramp  |  talk to me  00:05, 4 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete nn WikiScrubber (talk) 17:12, 5 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  Jerry   delusional ¤ kangaroo 22:57, 5 September 2008 (UTC)


 * Comment has anyone looked for sources to support assertions of notability? Just saying it is "nn" is hardly what proves it is so.  The deletion policy says the burden is on those calling for deletion to make a coherent argument.  The best way to achieve that end is to make a good faith effort to find sources.  You may be surprised and come back and say you found them, or you may come back and make a compelling argument for lack of notability like I checked here, here, and here, and I found no...  Jerry   delusional ¤ kangaroo 22:57, 5 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Well, to humor you Jerry, there are no results for google news archive. Also, stating the obvious, there are no google books results. I guess you don't need me to tell you how many google scholar results there are. Finally, again somewhat obviously, there are plenty (around 170) google web search results, none of which constitute significant coverage in a reliable source. So, in this case "non-notable" pretty well sums it up. PhilKnight (talk) 23:14, 5 September 2008 (UTC)


 * Delete - trivial coverage. PhilKnight (talk) 23:02, 5 September 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.