Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tobias Snape and Eileen Prince


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete and redirect to Severus Snape per here and on the talk page. --Core desat 07:05, 15 September 2007 (UTC)

Tobias Snape and Eileen Prince
Instead of being merged as non-notable, consensus at the talk page is to delete and redirect. Non-notable plot recitation.Judgesurreal777 20:40, 10 September 2007 (UTC)
 * Strongly Agree: delete and redirect. As noted in the talk page, Tobias Snape and Eileen Prince do not satisfy the Notability Criteria; their only appearances in the books are by reference and as an extremely brief unexplained vision that is part of a jumble. What little there was to say about them has been added to the Severus Snape page, and nothing else on the page is either Notable or relevant. Redirect to Severus Snape. Magidin 20:56, 10 September 2007 (UTC)
 * Comment - if you delete an article, you cannot then insert the code on the deleted page for it to redirect to Snape's article; so from a technical standpoint, notwithstanding the consensus at the talk page, delete and redirect is impossible. Perhaps everyone means to blank the page and redirect - in other words just redirect?  --T-dot ( Talk/ contribs ) 09:59, 11 September 2007 (UTC)
 * Right now, Eileen Prince and Tobias Snape redirect to Tobias Snape and Eileen Prince. Those two should redirect to Severus Snape instead, and Tobias Snape and Eileen Prince should be deleted (in my opinion). It is highly unlikely someone would type the full name directly anyway. Magidin 13:31, 11 September 2007 (UTC)
 * Oh OK I think I see. So delete Tobias Snape and Eileen Prince and redirect Tobias Snape and Eileen Prince to Severus Snape instead of to Tobias Snape and Eileen Prince.  I think I got it.  Those individual article re-redirects would be necessary after the candidate article is deleted, because they would then have nowhere to go.  Gotcha.  Just wanted to clear that up - if the candidate article on the couple is deleted, then it cannot then be set up to redirect back to Severus Snape because by definition it is gone; but the other "child" articles can and should be re-redirected.  Thanks for the clarification of the intent.  --T-dot ( Talk/ contribs ) 13:49, 11 September 2007 (UTC)


 * Redirect to Severus Snape. NawlinWiki 21:26, 10 September 2007 (UTC)
 * Redirect to Severus Snape as they are not notable in their own right. Capitalistroadster 02:38, 11 September 2007 (UTC)
 * Redirect to Snape. Makes sense. • Lawrence Cohen  17:00, 11 September 2007 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.