Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tod Lindberg


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. -- Cirt (talk) 00:02, 18 March 2010 (UTC)

Tod Lindberg

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

Research fellow at Hoover Institute, which I don't think alone qualifies for notability. I'd evaluate think-tank individuals much as we evaluate under WP:PROFESSOR, and I'm not seeing from the article those criteria being met. Shadowjams (talk) 07:52, 11 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep. Extensive GNews presence over extended period of time, as well as strong pattern of GBooks results, should be sufficient to demonstrate notability. Hullaballoo Wolfowitz (talk) 15:19, 11 March 2010 (UTC)


 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 16:10, 11 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep Editor of Policy Review, founding executive editor of The National Interest. Major figure in conservative journalism. Easily passes WP:BIO. Ray  Talk 18:49, 11 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep. Manages a GS h index of around 15 so far as I can see so probably passes WP:Prof #1, also significant media presence as public intellectual. Xxanthippe (talk) 07:19, 12 March 2010 (UTC).
 * Keep Extensive GNews coverage in his capacity as an expert, so looks like passes criterion 7 of WP:PROF. Nsk92 (talk) 18:00, 12 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Weak Keep Some amount of Gnews in his area. Also editor of Policy Review, its Washington.., meets #7, #8(The person is or has been an editor...) from WP:PROF. thx. --kaeiou (talk) 20:26, 13 March 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.