Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Today Translations


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   no consensus. The spam concern could possibly be addressed via stubbing?  Sandstein  12:20, 1 January 2014 (UTC)

Today Translations

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Fundamentally promotional : "In a huge public-relations coup, ", " its regular and topical surveys." . Too pervasive to be rewritable.  DGG ( talk ) 04:28, 9 December 2013 (UTC)
 * Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Articles for deletion/Log/2013 December 9.  — cyberbot I  Notify Online 04:39, 9 December 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions.  Jinkinson   talk to me  04:58, 9 December 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000(talk) 08:47, 9 December 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Language-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000(talk) 08:47, 9 December 2013 (UTC)


 * Comment They've got a lot of press, but for fundamentally trivial things. --Colapeninsula (talk) 17:19, 9 December 2013 (UTC)
 * Comment -- a Translation agncy with 2600 staff, handling 160 LANGUAGES ought to be notable. Peterkingiron (talk) 16:20, 15 December 2013 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mark Arsten (talk) 00:28, 16 December 2013 (UTC)

 
 * keep. lots of press, yes. triviality doesnt matter. kardashians way more trivial.- Altenmann >t 08:41, 16 December 2013 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mark Arsten (talk) 01:13, 23 December 2013 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.