Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Todd Connor


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. – Juliancolton  &#124; Talk 14:21, 2 September 2009 (UTC)

Todd Connor

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Low-level political candidate (for Water Commissioner no less) whose only claim to notability seems to be his homosexuality. Article is also poorly referenced. Closedmouth (talk) 14:33, 26 August 2009 (UTC)
 * He's involved in the political process, he's a decorated veteran, he was a congressional page, he's worked for a notable company, he's comfortable with himself... these are all very good things. Commendable, even. But there's nothing that would go to notability. Delete. DS (talk) 15:11, 26 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete fails WP:BIO at this stage of his political career. Going to New Trier, being in the Navy, having a job, or running for office do not by themselves or collectively grant inherent notability. Edison (talk) 17:18, 26 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete. Taken together, his accomplishments still flunk WP:BIO.  young  american  (wtf?) 18:48, 26 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Week Keep: Taken together, his accomplishments pass.- Ret.Prof (talk) 19:16, 26 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Comment. How so? Failing some outside sources, all I can see is a career in the Navy and an announced candidacy for a minor regional political office.  young  american  (wtf?) 11:14, 27 August 2009 (UTC)


 * Delete, article came to my attention because it uses the horrendous phrase "ChicagoIand area", and because this position isn't notable even after being elected to it. Speciate (talk) 14:02, 28 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete. No different than thousands of other non-notable people. Non-notable career in either the military, government or private sector. Candidate for a pretty insignificant office. Fails notability all the way around. Niteshift36 (talk) 14:01, 1 September 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.