Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Todd Gross


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the discussion was keep. Mailer Diablo 18:00, 13 July 2006 (UTC)

Todd Gross
Weather forecaster, marked as speedy but claims to be notable. You lot sort it out. --fvw *  06:00, 8 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep. As a Boston television personality, he's famous there. TruthbringerToronto (Talk | contribs) 06:20, 8 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Comment I lived in Boston for 4 years not so long ago. Never heard of this guy. hmmm. Bwithh 07:41, 8 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep. He's a weatherman at a major Boston news station, has his own website, and even Google thinks he's notable. tmopkisn tlka 06:33, 8 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Comment: it's a bit too soon to cast this article into the void. Nevertheless, I'm worried that the lack of detail on his TV career when weighed against the amount of space devoted to his new websites might look like SPAM SPAM SPAM SPAM SPAM SPAM SPAM SPAM . I've posted a more considered argument on Talk:Todd Gross. --07:32, 8 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep - He seems to be notable and the content in the article will not change that. Mário 20:03, 8 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete Being on TV != notability. TV is an industry, and the people who appear on it are as interchangeable as so many boxes of Cheerios. Wile E. Heresiarch 05:37, 9 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep -- A major-market TV personality should have lots of independent, verifiable info available on him out there. -- Mwalcoff 05:51, 9 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep -- I agree. Todd was a major market TV personality, and may show up soon again in the media.  In Boston history, he's famous for his work predicting The Perfect Storm, which was the basis of the movie. --Bjs1234 13:36, 13 July 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.