Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Todd Pearson (YouTube personality)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Yunshui 雲 水 08:22, 26 March 2020 (UTC)

Todd Pearson (YouTube personality)

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Delete per WP:BLP1E. Subject is not widely known by name, just for appearing in an internet meme. The meme itself is the topic in which this person should be mentioned. Fails WP:GNG and WP:NBIO. Binksternet (talk) 00:16, 19 March 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Popular culture-related deletion discussions. Binksternet (talk) 00:16, 19 March 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Louisiana-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 00:16, 19 March 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 00:16, 19 March 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Kansas-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 00:23, 19 March 2020 (UTC)


 * delete if the nominator's reasons aren't enough, I'm going with ignore all rules and that any rule standing in the way of deletion of this article should be ignored because deletion will make Wikipedia better.--Paul McDonald (talk) 01:55, 19 March 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete There is no notability or achievements in any respective field. A Wikipedia article for releasing a viral video on Youtube? Must be kidding me. - The9Man  ( Talk ) 06:46, 19 March 2020 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete per WP:G3 as I'm pretty sure this is a hoax article: none of the external links work, nor can I find any evidence of them on the internet, nor of the video that was supposedly famous. YorkshireLad ✿  (talk) 14:03, 19 March 2020 (UTC)
 * Speedy Delete YorkshireLad may indeed be correct that this is WP:HOAX. I looked at this subject last night and again this AM. The subject does not pass WP:N or WP:V. Lightburst (talk) 15:39, 19 March 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete This appears to be a hoax.John Pack Lambert (talk) 01:58, 21 March 2020 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.