Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Todd Spiewak


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 05:40, 9 May 2020 (UTC)

Todd Spiewak

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Article is primarily about his partner. Not the primary subject of significant coverage in reliable sources Adabow (talk) 23:44, 1 May 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. Adabow (talk) 23:44, 1 May 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Massachusetts-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 23:47, 1 May 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Pennsylvania-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 23:48, 1 May 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 23:48, 1 May 2020 (UTC)


 * Delete as I couldn't find sources to prove he is notable on his own at this point. 67.243.20.177 (talk) 16:46, 2 May 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete: Clearly fails the WP:GNG and WP:CREATIVE. Just because his husband Jim Parsons is notable, it doesn't make him automatically notable.-- LACali</b><b style="color: #2D68C4;">NYC</b> ✉ 00:20, 4 May 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete, Does not meet WP:GNG, Alex-h (talk) 11:36, 5 May 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete a non-notable individual.John Pack Lambert (talk) 21:42, 8 May 2020 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. <b style="color:red">Please do not modify it.</b> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.