Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Todmorden Markets


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   Withdrawn by nominator. (non-admin closure)  Theopolisme ( talk )  05:34, 30 July 2013 (UTC)

Todmorden Markets

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

The article has had notability and advert tags on it for almost three years and there have been no significant updates to the article during that period and certainly no attempt to address the issues. Scribble Monkey (talk) 09:43, 23 July 2013 (UTC)

Withdrawn by nominator - Scribble Monkey (talk) 17:08, 26 July 2013 (UTC)


 * Keep AFD is not cleanup and we don't have a deadline. A quick browse indicates that the market is covered in The British Market Hall: A Social and Architectural History, for example.  Warden (talk) 16:49, 23 July 2013 (UTC)
 * If it was only the notability of the article in question, I might agree, but this article has been tagged as an advert since its creation. It was disputed content prior to that when it was originally included in the Todmorden article. - Scribble Monkey (talk) 15:34, 24 July 2013 (UTC)
 * You are missing the point of the Colonel's first sentence. An article having maintenance tags, however long they have been there, is a reason to address the issues identified by those tags by editing, not a reason for deletion. Phil Bridger (talk) 21:55, 25 July 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:51, 24 July 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.