Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Toebow


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz Read! Talk! 06:12, 3 January 2023 (UTC)

Toebow

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Semi-advertorialized rticle about a band, not properly referenced as passing WP:NMUSIC. The only notability claim in evidence here is that their music exists, which isn't automatically enough in and of itself in the absence of WP:GNG-worthy media coverage about it -- but the referencing here is entirely to primary sources (their own Bandcamp, concert calendar listings self-published by individual venues where they've performed) and blogs rather than real GNG-worthy media. Nothing here is "inherently" notable enough to exempt them from having to have considerably better referencing than this. Bearcat (talk) 17:08, 26 December 2022 (UTC) Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Randykitty (talk) 17:16, 2 January 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Bands and musicians and New York. Bearcat (talk) 17:08, 26 December 2022 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Delete links in the Brooklyn Vegan and for a performance, nothing we can use for GNG.
 * Oaktree b (talk) 19:29, 2 January 2023 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.