Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Togasahata


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete.  Wifione  Message 22:31, 11 January 2012 (UTC)

Togasahata

 * – ( View AfD View log )

missing notability Steinhfer (talk) 23:03, 4 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Comment. It is probably too early to judge whether we should keep it or not, because it is waiting to be translated from Indonesian. Judging from the Google translation it looks like it's about the lineage of a royal family somewhere, so the subject is most likely notable . I think we should give the translation process a little more time - we can always nominate it for deletion again after the standard two weeks is up. —  Mr. Stradivarius ♫ 00:25, 5 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Based on Jun Kayama's thoughtful analysis below, I think we should probably just delete without worrying about translation. —  Mr. Stradivarius ♫ 03:26, 6 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Indonesia-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 00:59, 5 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lists of people-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 00:59, 5 January 2012 (UTC)


 * Delete I reckon, nothing to really suggest this family/clan is anything notable, no relevant google hits for Togasahata or any of the names in the list that I checked (didn't google them all, just searched half a dozen or so at random), and hard to glean any context, based on all that I'd say the chances of this being translated are slim.-- Jac 16888 Talk 01:58, 5 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete - This is a Batak clan lineage. It should actually be "Toga Sahata" (two words) and reference can be found here on Page 4 of the PDF file. There's some trivia here  for background information on the three sons of the Batak ancestor ... similar to the founding story of Kievan Rus, but absolutely nowhere near equivalent in terms of historical significance. Translated or not, this article has no future for expansion. Jun Kayama 02:39, 6 January 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.