Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Togavai Stanley


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Fenix down (talk) 22:58, 30 May 2022 (UTC)

Togavai Stanley

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Fails WP:GNG. All current references in the article are trivial mentions at best. Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 22:56, 23 May 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople, Football,  and Oceania. Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 22:56, 23 May 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. GiantSnowman 19:00, 24 May 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete - no evidence of notability. GiantSnowman 19:08, 24 May 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete: No independent sourcing of this sub-stub. No evidence of notability.  No suggestion that his level of play meets any extant notability criteria.    Ravenswing      00:52, 25 May 2022 (UTC)
 * Keep as meets WP:GNG see my argument on Articles for deletion/Vaisua Liva (2nd nomination) NealeWellington (talk) 08:54, 26 May 2022 (UTC)
 * Comment: To copy my response to your argument from there, neither the GNG, nor indeed any other notability guideline on Wikipedia, have opt-outs for a putative lack of sources. As has been demonstrated, there are indeed media outlets on Tuvalu.  If those outlets do not provide the substantive coverage to a subject the GNG requires, the answer isn't that we should therefore ignore the GNG.  The answer is that a Wikipedia article cannot be sustained on the subject, and it's rather breathtaking to suggest that a subject that blatantly does NOT meet the GNG really does, because, well, hrm, you want it to, because reasons.   Ravenswing      21:27, 26 May 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete not passing WP:GNG. --Angelo (talk) 00:06, 28 May 2022 (UTC)
 * Comment: Can we get some semi-protection, as it appears that these articles for deletion pages are being targeted by someone out there? --DarkMatterMan4500 (talk) (contribs) 15:27, 28 May 2022 (UTC)
 * let's not feed the trolls, honestly they'll just move to other articles/afds. PRAXIDICAE💕  15:28, 28 May 2022 (UTC)
 * Yeah, but seeing as they are doing this nonstop must get boring after a while. DarkMatterMan4500 (talk) (contribs) 15:29, 28 May 2022 (UTC)
 * well this conversation shouldn't be happening here but they've only hit this one once and no one is going to protect all AFDs. PRAXIDICAE💕  15:33, 28 May 2022 (UTC)
 * Can someone clarify the last for comments? Thank you. Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 15:35, 28 May 2022 (UTC)
 * Alright, I'll stop here then. No point of dwelling on that, is there? DarkMatterMan4500 (talk) (contribs) 15:36, 28 May 2022 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.