Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Toh Tuck


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was  keep. No arguments for deletion aside from the nominator. (non-admin closure) Ron Ritzman (talk) 23:58, 29 July 2009 (UTC)

Toh Tuck

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

This article fails to explain why the subject is notable. It is not clear whether this residential area exists or still under construction. Apart from being unencyclopedic, it is not referenced. Hitro 20:04, 9 July 2009 (UTC)  Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:04, 16 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Singapore-related deletion discussions.  Thryduulf (talk) 21:02, 9 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Comment - Being a neighborhood of Singapore is an explanation of why it's notable. But I'm having trouble figuring out if it's actually a distinctive neighborhood.  There seems to be a collection of streets with the "Toh Tuck" variation; ie Toh Tuck Road or Toh Tuck Terrace.  But these seem to be part of the Bukit Timah neighborhood, which I would likely choose to keep if there was such an article.  For this one, I don't know if anyone says "I live in Toh Tuck." --Oakshade (talk) 00:04, 10 July 2009 (UTC)
 * I've not done any research into this, but our Bukit Timah article implies that there is a district with that name as well as the hill the article focuses on. If this is the case, and the Toh Tuck collection of streets is part of the district, a merge might be appropriate. Thryduulf (talk) 00:46, 10 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.

 Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, – Juliancolton  &#124; Talk 00:12, 23 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.


 * Weak keep as Singapore is small enough and densely populated enough to only have so many regions, and this one is well-attested on the web. JJL (talk) 00:20, 23 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep Whether a merge is warranted can be worked out on the talk pages. ChildofMidnight (talk) 23:07, 23 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep or merge as a real place. Remove the bus routes as per WP:NOTGUIDE, consider adding it to Wikitravel.  A section on the history of the bus routes would be appropriate, but things specific to the immediate now are not.  --SmokeyJoe (talk) 12:39, 24 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep I have deleted the bus routes section, removed the references and already categorized. Considered okay to keep. Timothyhouse1 (talk) 11:30, 25 July 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.