Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Token black guide


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. If the book later obtains notability in the form of significant coverage in independent, reliable sources, or otherwise later qualifies per criteria at WP:BKCRIT, then no prejudice against recreation. N ORTH A MERICA 1000 00:33, 26 January 2015 (UTC)

Token black guide

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

non-notable, as yet unpublished book Fyddlestix (talk) 18:39, 18 January 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. N ORTH A MERICA 1000 20:06, 18 January 2015 (UTC)


 * Delete. I just can't find anything to show that this book passes notability guidelines at this point in time- the coverage for this book is so non-existent that I can't even tell when this book is to be released, who is publishing it, and so on, let along coverage of the book in reliable sources per WP:RS. If/when it gains that coverage it can always be re-created. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)   09:51, 20 January 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete – No coverage in reliable sources to establish the notability of the book. — Joaquin008  ( talk ) 11:58, 22 January 2015 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.