Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tokii


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. Michig (talk) 09:11, 25 January 2015 (UTC)

Tokii

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

The references are basically PR; The article in the Sacramento Bee for example, says at the bottom it is a press release. The article in the Globe and Mail is not about the company, but quotes the CEO. ... I note also the promotional bio at Karla Stephens-Tolstoy using mostly the same references--but it talks about other work also, so it needs separate consideration.  DGG ( talk ) 00:20, 4 January 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions.  Everymorning   talk  01:31, 4 January 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. lavender|(formerlyHMSSolent)|lambast 01:58, 4 January 2015 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  Rcsprinter123    (push)  @ 14:59, 10 January 2015 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
 * Delete – It looks like the web-based service never made it. It has now shut down and in its place the company is providing an iPhone app. I found no evidence at all that the app is notable, so the article couldn't be created today. This leaves the question, what to do about the old service? It got some publicity around 2012 when it was launched, but nothing since then and the article has had no substantive updates since then. Under NTEMP we're not supposed to delete these articles if they were notable enough to be created in the first place. But IMO it was too early. We shouldn't create articles on startups until they've been around for a year or so and are still notable. Instead of being a good idea that looked like it had the potential to become notable but in retrospect never did. – Margin1522 (talk) 17:06, 10 January 2015 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  01:13, 18 January 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete Company got press at launch, but not afterwards. Shii (tock) 06:03, 18 January 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete - Besides launch press, there is no indication of notability. — Joaquin008  ( talk ) 12:20, 22 January 2015 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.