Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tokyo Cop


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Mark Arsten (talk) 01:08, 1 January 2014 (UTC)

Tokyo Cop

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

I can't see any explanation of how this game meets the notability criteria for video games. The references are either to the company sites or to unreliable sources like YouTube which only show that the game exists  Jimfbleak -  talk to me?  07:15, 23 December 2013 (UTC)
 * This is liitle common. Well and actually, this was slightly likable and just a reason that it would be reasonable. As of this moment, I'm actually found out that there's already an official page, but Jimfbleak said that it doens't have to be considerable but unsourced. And yes, it's also a rival for Taito's Chase H.Q., the popular police-chase game anywhere inside the country to play this game alone. So that's it... --The Game Expert  (talk) 07:33, 23 December 2013 (UTC)
 * An article needs to have multiple reliable sources that are independent of the subject to be considered notable on Wikipedia (see WP:N). An official site in no independent and while YouTube videos could be they are not considered reliable sources outside or rare exceptions (and I see nothing to indicate that is the case here). Also, the game being a rival of a game that is notable would not help either due to WP:NOTINHERITED. If all we have are the official site and YouTube videos this should be deleted since it is not even close to passing the notability guideline. If you can find other sources for us to evaluate that would be helpful since we need more than we have now.--174.93.163.194 (talk) 01:06, 24 December 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of video game-related deletion discussions.  &#9733;&#9734;  DUCK IS JAMMMY &#9734;&#9733; 17:44, 23 December 2013 (UTC)


 * Delete as not passing WP:GNG with multiple reliable independent in-depth sources, such as WP:VG/RS. I cannot find any in-depth coverage, like reviews or even mentions in other context. Nothing linked in the article is GNG-usable. I'm afraid I cannot decypher Tambok0599's argument, but it doesn't address existence of reliable sourcing and thus our notability and inclusion criteria. Obviously, other similar games have no relevance to this game's notability. — HELL KNOWZ  ▎TALK 14:17, 24 December 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.