Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tokyo Dawn Records


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   no consensus. (WP:NPASR). (Non-administrator closure) NorthAmerica1000 10:20, 1 October 2014 (UTC)

Tokyo Dawn Records

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Non-notable label associated with non-notable artists. Λeternus (talk) 18:09, 2 September 2014 (UTC)
 * Keep. Article has been on wikipedia for almost 10 yrs.  Numerous artists with Wikipedia pages (thus notable?) have links to the record label article. See links above (https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:WhatLinksHere/Tokyo_Dawn_Records&limit=999)  .  &mdash; Gaff  ταλκ
 * Article's lifespan on Wikipedia is irrelevant in establishing its subject's notability. Also, notability is not inherited, which means the subject needs to be independently covered by multiple reliable sources. --Λeternus (talk) 21:40, 2 September 2014 (UTC)
 * True, Lifespan on WP does not = notable, but it the number of notable artists with WP articles that link to this page (because it is their record label) does account for something. As for the sholar articles mentioned below: http://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=%22Tokyo+Dawn+Records%22  (This is also avilable above this discussion on the "find sources" section.  &mdash; Gaff  ταλκ 22:35, 2 September 2014 (UTC)
 * Keep. Several mentions on Google Scholar, appears to be a well established and respected netlabel.  MEP MEP1697 (talk) 21:25, 2 September 2014 (UTC)
 * Can you provide some links to these Google Scholar mentions? (Also keep in mind that trivial mentioning is not sufficient in establishing notability.) --Λeternus (talk) 21:40, 2 September 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Germany-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:38, 5 September 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:38, 5 September 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:38, 5 September 2014 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NorthAmerica1000 09:35, 13 September 2014 (UTC)

 
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NorthAmerica1000 12:41, 23 September 2014 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.