Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tokyo Mew Inc.


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Speedy deleted by  as "G3: Blatant hoax". Non-admin closure — frankie (talk) 14:29, 11 November 2011 (UTC)

Tokyo Mew Inc.

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Google for company and CEO turned up as nothing. Possible hoax. DragonZero ( Talk  ·  Contribs ) 08:39, 11 November 2011 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete as hoax via WP:G3. I'm not finding anything substantial and what I am finding heavily shows this being a hoax. The CEO appears to have a channel on Youtube where he appears to be a teenaged boy., He and his "company" left a comment on another account which seems to make me lean more towards this being a hoax. (See this account  on page 1 & 2.) The only ghits about this refer back to the same kid from youtube, from posts he or one of his friends seemed to have made. Tokyogirl79 (talk) 08:51, 11 November 2011 (UTC)tokyogirl79
 * Speedy delete as a hoax The show's own website still reports the anime still under the copyright of Studio Pierrot. This can't be right. I, Jethrobot drop me a line (note: not a bot!) 08:53, 11 November 2011 (UTC)
 * Do I just tag it for speedy deletion now or do I wait for this to close? DragonZero  ( Talk  ·  Contribs ) 08:54, 11 November 2011 (UTC)
 * I've tagged it already. An admin will come along soon enough. I, Jethrobot drop me a line (note: not a bot!) 08:56, 11 November 2011 (UTC)
 * Thanks! I was about to do it myself, glad to see you beat me to it. Tokyogirl79 (talk) 08:58, 11 November 2011 (UTC)tokyogirl79
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions.  —Tom Morris (talk) 09:09, 11 November 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Anime and manga-related deletion discussions.  —Tom Morris (talk) 09:09, 11 November 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.