Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tokyo Mew Mew Spinoffs


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete  ---  Keeper   |   76   |   Disclaimer  21:31, 14 March 2008 (UTC)

Tokyo Mew Mew Spinoffs

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Two are not spin-offs, only individual chapters from the manga series, two are video games, one is a sequel. All are already covered by Tokyo Mew Mew and do not need a separate NPOV, unsourced listing. Collectonian (talk) 18:20, 8 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep. Move to Tokyo Mew Mew series. --Oldak Quill 18:49, 8 March 2008 (UTC)
 * They are already covered in Tokyo Mew Mew and they are not series. Only one is a "sequel" and its a two volume manga sequel to the original manga. Collectonian (talk) 18:54, 8 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Since "series" in the name suggested is not capitalised, that title isn't a proper noun and doesn't suggest there is an officially-dubbed Series. There's precedent for grouping related media (movies, books) together under "X series" when there is common derivation, but no official grouping-term. See the lists at book series, movie series and video game series for examples (as a quick example: Foundation series is about some of Isaac Asimov's work that are related in a similar way.)--Oldak Quill 21:41, 8 March 2008 (UTC)
 * That does not apply to anime/manga articles. Per our MOS, unless they are vastly different (which these are not), we cover the original manga series and discuss its anime adaptation and video games in the same article. Theses are not a series. It is a single series, Tokyo Mew Mew, from which an anime adaptation was created and a short, two volume "sequel".  Collectonian (talk) 23:47, 8 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Anime and manga-related deletion discussions.   —Collectonian (talk) 19:28, 8 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete as everything in it is already covered in the main article. Comparing this series to the Foundation series is a bit of a stretch, I think. ··· 日本穣 ? · Talk to Nihonjoe 23:14, 8 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete per Nihonjoe. —Quasirandom (talk) 23:56, 8 March 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.