Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tokyo in pop culture (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was Speedy keep. This closure is no reflection on my own !vote, but rather on the consensus among other users that opening a new AfD the same day that the previous one closed is a little too soon. Non-admin closure. Ten Pound Hammer • (Broken clamshells•Otter chirps) 04:10, 6 December 2007 (UTC)
 * Closure endorsed. Seriously, the world will not end tomorrow. Give it a few days before nominating again. Or just redirect it and see if anyone cares.—Random832 16:33, 6 December 2007 (UTC)

Tokyo in pop culture
AfDs for this article: 
 * – (View AfD) (View log)

This survived a previous deletion discussion by deleting a long list of trivia. What remains is an almost exact duplication of the Tokyo in popular media section from the article Tokyo. This fork now exists only to have a new IPC list appended. I have merged the one new sentence back into the Tokyo article for consideration by editors there. / edg ☺ ☭ 17:00, 5 December 2007 (UTC)

Comment Do I understand correctly that the prior Afd ended today? Could you elaborate further as to why a second Afd is required at this time? Xymmax (talk) 17:40, 5 December 2007 (UTC)
 * Speedy keep. I haven't heard of a justification for this highly unusual nomination. Xymmax (talk) 22:17, 5 December 2007 (UTC)


 * I concur. What's the point?  If content has been merged back, we probably don't want to delete this article anyway per GFDL concerns.  Anyway, this whole request is based on how I removed the list of mentions, which is NOT an action I took as the closer of the previous debate, but rather as an ordinary editor.  Perhaps I should have just redirected the page instead, and I would have had I realized that the header text was already present at Tokyo.  Edg - just withdraw this and redirect the page.  It's too soon to have an actual debate.  Mango juice talk 18:17, 5 December 2007 (UTC)
 * Speedy keep seeing the previous AfD was just deleted, no need to relist so soon. Could this be taken to WP:DRV? Ten Pound Hammer  • (Broken clamshells•Otter chirps) 18:46, 5 December 2007 (UTC)
 * Speedy Keep Having just voted to delete this page in the last 24 hours, and having seen it survive, I now vote keep, not because the page deserves it (it still should go) but rather because it is out of process to nominate it again.--CastAStone|(talk) 19:52, 5 December 2007 (UTC)
 * Speedy Keep. This was opened an hour and 3 minutes after an AfD that had been open for 9 days closed. Consensus can change...but I doubt it can in one hour. --SmashvilleBONK! 21:31, 5 December 2007 (UTC)
 * Procedural Speedy Keep too soon after last AfD... (way waaaaay too soon ) 132.205.99.122 (talk) 22:25, 5 December 2007 (UTC)
 * Speedy Keep for the same reasons as everyone else. ··· 日本穣 ? · Talk to Nihonjoe 01:47, 6 December 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.