Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tolgus Mount


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. (non-admin closure) Bryce  ( talk  &#124;  contribs ) 02:41, 26 January 2012 (UTC)

Tolgus Mount

 * – ( View AfD View log )

This is not an article, just a simple dictionary definition with no sources, and does not provide information a typical article of the type should, such as area and population. It provides no information other than a definition. There is no proof it is notable or if it even exists to begin with. If more information can be found later, it can be easily recreated. Stedrick (talk) 16:13, 19 January 2012 (UTC)


 * Speedy keep "There is no proof it is notable or if it even exists to begin with. " Eh, did you actually google/google book search it before nominating? Nobody should be be permitted to take an article to AFD without assessing its notability first by looking for sources. Its takes 5 seconds to validate something. Notable articles will always be notable so deleting them is pretty pointless. Most articles on wikipedia need expansion of some sort.♦ Dr. Blofeld  17:07, 19 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 01:14, 20 January 2012 (UTC)


 * Speedy Keep per Dr. Blofeld. Even if the article just said "Tolgus Mount sucks" I'd still vote "keep" (and obviously improve).  A classic example of why WP:BEFORE should be a requirement. --Oakshade (talk) 07:26, 20 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Keep. Villages are invariably considered to be notable. I fear the nominator needs to brush up on just what a dictionary definition is and the policy for retention of stubs. -- Necrothesp (talk) 14:37, 20 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Keep -- While I am not quite sure that "village" is the correct term, from my examination of Google maps, it is clear that the location does exist. The name "Tolgus" appears to apply to a rural area adjoining the town of Redruth.  Whether the article should be at Tolgus Mount or Tolgus, I am not qualified to judge, not being a local.  For the significance of remains there see   and  - a few of the rsults from a google search against Tolgus Redruth.  Peterkingiron (talk) 21:31, 21 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Yes Tolgus is the rural district area to the northwest of Redruth. The village is split into several dispersed hamlets which include West Tolgus, East Tolgus etc.♦ Dr. Blofeld  21:39, 22 January 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.