Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tollbridge Technologies


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete. WP:REFUND applies. 78.26 (spin me / revolutions) 19:20, 19 December 2019 (UTC)

Tollbridge Technologies

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Subject not notable. Tollbridge was an early implementer of VoIP, but fails WP:GNG and WP:CORPDEPTH. I located coverage, but it consists of name mentions or investor reports only. Skeletor3000 (talk) 19:13, 26 November 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. Skeletor3000 (talk) 19:13, 26 November 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. Skeletor3000 (talk) 19:13, 26 November 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. Skeletor3000 (talk) 19:13, 26 November 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. Skeletor3000 (talk) 19:13, 26 November 2019 (UTC)


 * How does this nomination stand re WP:NOTTEMPORARY? If they were notable at one point, and being early providers of a significant technology would indicate this, then they stay notable. Andy Dingley (talk) 20:53, 26 November 2019 (UTC)
 * There were several early providers, and articles I found listing Tollbridge as such also listed several other comapanies alongside them. Many of the financial press items I found were from the time the company was still in operation. I think it's safe to assume that if there was other media coverage of the company, it would also be showing up in a search. That said, in spite of my efforts to be thorough, I've been mistaken about a lack of coverage before. I encourage you or anyone else interested in this discussion to conduct their own research. Skeletor3000 (talk) 20:59, 26 November 2019 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Barkeep49 (talk) 15:26, 4 December 2019 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, 78.26  (spin me / revolutions) 22:17, 11 December 2019 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.