Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tom Aditya (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete.  Sandstein  18:27, 22 May 2020 (UTC)

Tom Aditya
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

The article was previously deleted as per Articles for deletion/Tom Aditya. As per discussions and feedback I do find the person has attained notability (like holding Mayor position etc.) but still lacks WP:GNG criteria to be accepted here. ~Amkgp ✉  10:09, 15 May 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. ~Amkgp  ✉  10:09, 15 May 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. ~Amkgp  ✉  10:09, 15 May 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. ~Amkgp  ✉  10:09, 15 May 2020 (UTC)

keep — Preceding unsigned comment added by Easytostable (talk • contribs) 08:17, 17 May 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete. Bradley Stoke is a small town that does not have directly elected mayors, but just rotates the position annually among the municipal councillors, so there's no "inherent" notability just for being a mayor per se — but this is written far more like self-promotion than a real encyclopedia article, and is heavily reference bombed to a mix of primary sources that are not support for notability at all (any claim that you have to "reference" to a directly affiliated entity's own self-published content about itself, because media coverage about that claim is nonexistent, is automatically not an article-clinching notability claim) and coverage in Bradley Stoke's own community hyperlocal, which is not enough coverage to get him over the bar all by itself. Smalltown mayors are not notable enough for Wikipedia articles if you can't show any evidence of nationalizing media attention. Bearcat (talk) 17:17, 15 May 2020 (UTC)
 * Please read WP:JUSTAVOTE. It's not enough to just say keep and drop the mic — you have to articulate policy-based reasons as to why it should be kept. Bearcat (talk) 15:33, 18 May 2020 (UTC)


 * Delete fails in most WP:BIO and WP:GNG criteria. ~Amkgp ✉  13:33, 17 May 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete Nothing in RS, fails GNG. MistyGraceWhite (talk) 20:39, 17 May 2020 (UTC)
 * Invite and request for review. Thank you. ~Amkgp ✉  01:24, 18 May 2020 (UTC)


 * Delete an overly promotional article on a non-notable politician.John Pack Lambert (talk) 12:22, 18 May 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete does not have enough coverage to meet WP:GNG, and being mayor of Bradley Stoke does not make one inherently notable. Eddie891 Talk Work 12:59, 18 May 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete - As has been noted above being mayor of a small town in England would not in itself meet notability requirements. His involvement in bodies such as a police committee and a university court are not uncommon for someone holding even minor local elected office. While someone has clearly put much effort into this article, I am afraid that there does not seem to me to be signs that the subject is notable outwith his local area. Dunarc (talk) 19:28, 18 May 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete. Fails WP:NPOL. Resembles WP:PUFF. Lefcentreright  Talk  (plz ping) 21:38, 18 May 2020 (UTC)
 * Keep per GNG. He has 89 references and there not all local. Iamreallygoodatcheckers (talk) 03:55, 21 May 2020 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.