Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tom Beets


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   redirect to Flanders Recorder Quartet. King of &hearts;   &diams;   &clubs;  &spades; 19:30, 7 April 2012 (UTC)

Tom Beets

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Page was already deleted yesterday via CSD Seduisant (talk) 02:41, 16 March 2012 (UTC)
 * Comment: This might be best served as a redirect to Flanders Recorder Quartet, as the band itself seems to have notability but I'm not sure that Beets himself does. I'll look for sources, but a redirect is usually the best idea in these situations.Tokyogirl79 (talk) 05:45, 16 March 2012 (UTC)
 * Protected redirect to Flanders Recorder Quartet. I did a search and while the band itself is very notable, Beets is not notable outside of the span of the group. I didn't see any reliable sources that covered him individually outside of the band. I recommend a protected redirect since I have a feeling that the original editor might try to swiftly revert or recreate the article after its redirected, as evidenced by the swift re-adding of the article to Wikipedia.Tokyogirl79 (talk) 06:04, 16 March 2012 (UTC)
 * Additional. It also looks like the article has been deleted and re-created three times, not including this current incarnation, if I'm not mistaken, all within the span of about 24 hours. I just wanted any closing admins to be aware of this and that it's highly likely that there will be an attempt to recreate the article if it's not protected.Tokyogirl79 (talk) 06:06, 16 March 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 23:31, 17 March 2012 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:36, 23 March 2012 (UTC)

 
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, The Bushranger One ping only 04:35, 30 March 2012 (UTC)


 * Redirect to the quartet. No individual notability. I have removed part of the article which had clearly been copied from the source cited. The article only appears to have been previously deleted once. --Michig (talk) 07:52, 30 March 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.