Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tom Choi


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Black Kite (talk) 06:30, 21 June 2019 (UTC)

Tom Choi

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Promotion for non notable actor. Lacks multiple significant roles in notable productions. (Teen Wolf had a lot of episodes but was never a main character). None of the awards are majors. Lacks coverage in independent reliable sources. Article is bombarded with multiple sources but none are independent reliable sources with any depth of coverage of him. duffbeerforme (talk) 11:59, 12 June 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions.  CASSIOPEIA(talk) 13:22, 12 June 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Korea-related deletion discussions.  CASSIOPEIA(talk) 13:22, 12 June 2019 (UTC)
 * Note:
 * Note: This debate has been included in the Article Rescue Squadron's list of content for rescue consideration.  Lubbad85   (☎) 19:56, 16 June 2019 (UTC)
 * The advertisement rescue squadron has been called in. duffbeerforme (talk) 04:05, 19 June 2019 (UTC)


 * Keep A notable actor who has appeared in multiple mainstream television and movie productions. Subject also has Sustained notability (not required)  Lubbad85   (☎</b>) 19:56, 16 June 2019 (UTC)
 * Just being in multiple productions is not enough for NACTOR. duffbeerforme (talk) 04:05, 19 June 2019 (UTC)


 * Keep He played the lead role in a film notable enough to have significant coverage at NBC news. He got coverage at  At  "Tom Choi does a very good job as Brad’s straight-laced father".  That's just some of the first page results Google news search shows for "Tom Choi" "actor".  Other stuff appearing as well but I think that's enough.   D r e a m Focus  19:31, 17 June 2019 (UTC)
 * Popdust looks good. Getting closer. duffbeerforme (talk) 04:05, 19 June 2019 (UTC)


 * Comment In this diff an undisclosed paid editor tag was added without a rationale. I'm going to remove but add it back if there is a rationale - upe is a specific type of spam (hired work) not just any spam like by a friend or family which would be a COI.  --  Green  C  20:56, 20 June 2019 (UTC)
 * Weak Keep can understand why the article was nominated. I'm swayed towards the keep side because of the board membership in SAG-AFTRA - checking the results he was re-elected in 2017 - this can be seen as recognition amongst his peers. --Goldsztajn (talk) 22:32, 20 June 2019 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. <b style="color:red">Please do not modify it.</b> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.