Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tom Clancey's H.A.W.X. Bugs and Errors


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   Delete - I'm... melting...!

Tom Clancey's H.A.W.X. Bugs and Errors
AfDs for this article: 
 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Wikipedia is not a place to store information on bugs and how to fix them. There may be errors like this, yes, but 1) they shouldn't have their own page and 2) until there is a better reference than a fan forum they shouldn't be here at all. Ironholds (talk) 11:39, 31 March 2009 (UTC) Ironholds (talk) 11:39, 31 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete per WP:NOT. Hopefully this'll snow and get taken care of quickly. Glass  Cobra  12:25, 31 March 2009 (UTC)
 * But the article is fact based. The facts are provided and confirmed by All users of this software. So that's OK.  *ahem* Seriously, delete per massive failure of WP:NOT -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 12:37, 31 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete, Wikipedia is not a bug tracker. Lankiveil (speak to me) 13:32, 31 March 2009 (UTC).
 * Delete effectively a game guide, and the only source is a web forum. JJL (talk) 14:20, 31 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete - if the bugs were notable, then perhaps it would be worth mentioning in the main article (as per my merge proposal), but as yet noone has come forth with any evidence of notability apart from a forum (an unreliable source). Astronaut (talk) 15:04, 31 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of video game related deletion discussions. MrKIA11 (talk) 16:19, 31 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete. Blatant game guide content and original research. Haipa Doragon (talk • contributions) 16:36, 31 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete per lack of verifiability and per WP:NOT as indicated by everyone above. Nothing verifiable to merge, and a redirect is not feasible since "Clancy" is misspelled as "Clancey" in the title. MuZemike 17:53, 31 March 2009 (UTC)
 * That and the irregular capitalisation of "Bugs" and "Errors". Haipa Doragon (talk • contributions) 18:41, 31 March 2009 (UTC)
 * It's snowing Wikipedia is not a gameguide or instruction manual. The first post on the talk page: "This article cannot be merged with the original H.A.W.X. wiki page. This do to many prior attempts to add these facts to the H.A.W.X. page before. They have been removed many times over by someone trying to hide the facts about this faulty software. All the information added here is true and up to date. making edits to this page to make it more factual would be more appropriate." IE this is a fork apparently created to spread the truth! No thanks, virtually every game has bugs and virutally every game's bugs are either pointed out in multiple reliable sources or not worth the time of day. Someoneanother 18:29, 31 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete: per statement listed in the PROD I placed 30 March 2009, as well as tags I added 30 March 2009. 130.85.241.123 (talk) 19:57, 31 March 2009 (UTC)  Apologies, 130.85.241.123 post was by me, forgot to log in.Compassghost (talk) 03:45, 1 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete per WP:NOTGUIDE.  ♪Tempo  di Valse ♪  20:48, 31 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete or merge: if it's not notable for inclusion in the main article, why would it be worthy of its own article?? spǝǝp  spɹoʍ  3100ʇnɯɐɥɐq  06:34, 1 April 2009 (UTC)
 * SNOW delete. Per above WP:GAMEGUIDE. MLauba (talk) 10:13, 2 April 2009 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.