Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tom Clerc


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge to Sign Gene. (non-admin closure) { {ping&#124;ClydeFranklin }} (t/c) 21:56, 16 March 2023 (UTC)

Tom Clerc

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Not independently notable and an implausible redirect target because hardly anybody is likely to know who this character is. Dronebogus (talk) 10:35, 9 March 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. Dronebogus (talk) 10:35, 9 March 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete or redirect per reasons stated in Articles for deletion/Tatsumi Fuwa. More Sign Gene-related WP:FANCRUFT. (I don't mind redirects, they are WP:CHEAP). --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus&#124; reply here 14:36, 9 March 2023 (UTC)
 * Merge and redirect to Sign Gene. "hardly anybody is likely to know who this character is" is a rather bold claim for the protagonist of a - if low-budget - film, who has at least been mentioned at BBC News and several other magazines, both present in the article and not. Seeing that the reception section currently refers to the film rather than the character specifically, I think the best solution would be to merge the sourced content there. Daranios (talk) 16:08, 9 March 2023 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.