Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tom Crosshill


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus per WP:SNOW. There was no further discussion in two weeks, during which further comments were not added. There was still some time left to add comments, however the outcome of this AFD has become almost certain to the point it is not going to change before the time closes and no need to prolong discussion further. Not relisted for a third time per WP:RELIST (non-admin closure) MaxnaCarter (talk) 05:25, 31 May 2022 (UTC)

Tom Crosshill

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Article is sourced almost entirely to his website. Can't find any sources with WP:SIGCOV. Galobtter (pingó mió) 01:55, 10 May 2022 (UTC) Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗  plicit  11:25, 17 May 2022 (UTC) Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 13:28, 24 May 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People and Authors. Galobtter (pingó mió) 01:55, 10 May 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete no sources found. I wonder if he has 900 gold medals like the fellow above does? Oaktree b (talk) 03:02, 10 May 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Latvia-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 08:47, 10 May 2022 (UTC)
 * Strong Keep. Looks like the sole objections (limited sources/no sources found) have been addressed by User:MaryMO (AR), leaving, it appears to me, nothing to debate. BPK (talk) 16:42, 13 May 2022 (UTC)
 * @BPK2 I looked at the sources added. I don't see any of them that are independent, reliable and have significant coverage. I also don't see enough for WP:NAUTHOR (there's one review I found of one of his novels but that's all I could find in terms of non-blog reviews). The sources in the article right now that are not by Tom Crosshill himself either verify that he was nominated or got an award for one of his stories, are interviewing him about some financial topic. There's one interview with him about himself but interviews are not really independent and one WP:INTERVIEW by itself is not enough for WP:NBIO. Galobtter (pingó mió) 23:25, 13 May 2022 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.