Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tom Farniok


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep. Nomination withdrawn. (non-admin closure) Mellowed Fillmore (talk) 17:43, 22 May 2015 (UTC)

Tom Farniok

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

He is a recently signed, undrafted (amended, as noted below)  player, so does not satisfy WP:NGRIDIRON. I do not see anything in the article that satisfies WP:NCOLLATH or WP:GNG either. AtHomeIn神戸 (talk) 02:55, 22 May 2015 (UTC)
 * I would like to close this before wasting anyone else's time. Thank you to for doing what I should have done in the first palce. AtHomeIn神戸 (talk) 06:13, 22 May 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sports-related deletion discussions. -War wizard90 (talk) 02:58, 22 May 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. -War wizard90 (talk) 02:58, 22 May 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of American football-related deletion discussions. -War wizard90 (talk) 02:58, 22 May 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Iowa-related deletion discussions. -War wizard90 (talk) 02:59, 22 May 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of South Dakota-related deletion discussions. -War wizard90 (talk) 02:59, 22 May 2015 (UTC)


 * Delete Actually he's a recently signed, undrafted player. Not that that factoid helps his case in anyway. Delete per nom otherwise. -War wizard90 (talk) 03:00, 22 May 2015 (UTC)
 * Keep based off of new sources provided by Cbl62, clearly has significant enough coverage to pass WP:NCOLLATH. I made the mistake of only using the refs already listed in the article, which left something to be desired, should've done my WP:BEFORE. -War wizard90 (talk) 06:03, 22 May 2015 (UTC)


 * Comment. Haven't looked at it in detail, but a google search does turn up a fair bit of coverage, e.g., this, this, this, this, this. Cbl62 (talk) 05:03, 22 May 2015 (UTC)
 * Keep as a WP:GNG pass, per Cbl62. Ejgreen77 (talk) 10:48, 22 May 2015 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.