Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tom Feister


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Draftify. Given the (non-sock) comments and an otherwise equal participation, there was consensus that this shouldn't still be sitting here, but a no-consensus otherwise, and so I'm defaulting to draftifying it. Nosebagbear (talk) 12:40, 19 April 2022 (UTC)

Tom Feister

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Artist does not meet notability guidelines. Sources are from an inactive website, The article is also written like a resume. Crimson Comedian  Talk  04:17, 22 March 2022 (UTC) Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗  plicit  11:35, 29 March 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Comics and animation-related deletion discussions.  Crimson Comedian   Talk  04:17, 22 March 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Visual arts-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 04:44, 22 March 2022 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 23:08, 4 April 2022 (UTC)
 * Comment He is award winning artist. The only issue I see with the article is" it's written like resume" Mbilalwiki (talk) 13:54, 29 March 2022 (UTC)
 * Comment Agreed, this is written like a resume. He's mentioned enough times as a comic book artist, not sure how notable he is. No fixed opinion. Oaktree b (talk) 15:13, 29 March 2022 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Relisting comment: third time is a charm for some additional input? Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Star   Mississippi  02:22, 12 April 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete No assertion of notability as no sources can be found. Fails GNG.— Mythdon ( talk  •  contribs ) 23:23, 4 April 2022 (UTC)
 * Comment I found one Publisher's Weekly review that names him as an author. Adding even a few of his titles to the article could bring this up to WP:NAUTHOR. The Google Books search reveals a large number. Lamona (talk) 14:30, 5 April 2022 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.


 * Draftify As written, subject does not have clear case for notability per WP:GNG. Claims that would establish that need independent sources, but I do not think deletion is the next step here. NiklausGerard (talk) 05:04, 12 April 2022 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.