Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tom Guerra


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) DavidLeighEllis (talk) 21:46, 16 June 2016 (UTC)

Tom Guerra

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Reason Synergism1 (talk) 21:32, 9 June 2016 (UTC) Low notability and not enough reliable, unbiased sources are available. Article is also written like something that I would expect to see on this guy's website as opposed to a wikipedia page.
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 21:47, 9 June 2016 (UTC)


 * Weak keep I do agree with that article needs a lot of work. The only page that is explicitly listed as a reference on the article is its own webpage. There are other sources listed that could be used but should be properly cited. In addition to the listed interviews, I could find this article from Music Nashville. So there seems to be just barely enough in depth coverage from independent reliable sources to meet our general notability guidelines. If the article is kept it should be either improved or tagged. --Crystallizedcarbon (talk) 18:24, 10 June 2016 (UTC)
 * Keep - Again, the page needs cleanup and currently reads like a puff piece but the subject is somewhat notable. Meatsgains (talk) 01:57, 13 June 2016 (UTC)
 * Keep - The article satisfies WP:N's "General principles". Whilst the article does need work, that is not a proper deletion rational (See WP:IMPERFECT, WP:HANDLE, WP:IMPROVE, etc). Dan arndt (talk) 06:41, 13 June 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.