Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tom Harb


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__. Daniel (talk) 21:29, 16 January 2024 (UTC)

Tom Harb

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Fails WP:GNG. Rejected at AFC but moved to mainspace my creator so bringing here for community discussion. Theroadislong (talk) 17:33, 9 January 2024 (UTC)
 * Delete. I personally would have gone straight to PROD since it was moved to mainspace after being rejected at AFC. Drowssap  SMM  18:18, 9 January 2024 (UTC)
 * The is now the third time the creator has moved the draft to mainspace so unlikely PROD would be effective. S0091 (talk) 19:12, 9 January 2024 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Politicians and Middle East. Owen&times;  &#9742;  18:24, 9 January 2024 (UTC)
 * Delete The drafts were rejected for a reason and and a COI editor, declared or not, repeatedly trying to put an article into the mainspace without being cleared by a reviewer is a violation of policy. Best, GPL93 (talk) 20:49, 9 January 2024 (UTC)
 * There is nothing, to my knowledge, that requires an article creator to make use of the broken Articles for Creation process. This is not to say this piece should not be deleted, only that I believe you are misrepresenting policy. Carrite (talk) 21:03, 16 January 2024 (UTC)


 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Businesspeople and Florida.  WC  Quidditch   ☎   ✎  20:50, 9 January 2024 (UTC)


 * Delete per above.
 *  Qcne  (talk)  21:46, 9 January 2024 (UTC)


 * Delete and block the creator to enforce deletion, if needed. This is beyond disruptive. Giving them a final warning now. Star   Mississippi  02:14, 10 January 2024 (UTC)
 * Delete This is an article that simply does not support a claim of notability with reliable and verifiable sources. Perhaps this should be a draft or go back to AfC, but it's unclear that the editor behind this article understands the process of creating a proper Wikipedia article. Alansohn (talk) 04:41, 10 January 2024 (UTC)
 * Delete. I did my WP:BEFORE when first draftifying this. The subject doesn't meet the relevant notability criteria, as there is a lack of in depth-coverage in secondary sourcing, and no SNG such as WP:ANYBIO appears to be fulfilled. I'll additionally note that AfC isn't mandatory and not following the AfC process and having a COI are not reasons to delete.—Alalch E. 09:08, 10 January 2024 (UTC)
 * Delete, per the above. This subject is non-notable, and the creator may have a conflict of interest. Secondary and in depth sourcing is also absent. HarukaAmaranth  春香 23:41, 12 January 2024 (UTC)
 * Delete – per above, + sources consist of press releases and self published profiles. TLA  (talk) 02:51, 14 January 2024 (UTC)


 * Delete. Per above, plus the article is heavily biased towards the person based on tone (hence why a close connection is plausible) and that close connection is strengthened by the person not being notable enough to have much unbiased coverage. CharlieEdited (talk) 15:49, 14 January 2024 (UTC)


 * Delete - Fails GNG. Carrite (talk) 21:03, 16 January 2024 (UTC)
 * Comment - If this truly has been through the AfD process before, feel free to Salt. Not passing the slow, arbitrary, inconsistent Articles for Creation process is no terminal first strike, however. Carrite (talk) 21:05, 16 January 2024 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.