Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tom Kroesbergen


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Cirt (talk) 00:09, 3 February 2010 (UTC)

Tom Kroesbergen

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

An oddly non-notable person, given the claim to fame. No hits whatsoever in Google Books, and only four in a Google News search--of which only two seem to offer what we might, possibly, call significant discussion of the topic, which is what WP:N requires (more than just mention). Drmies (talk) 03:11, 27 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 15:58, 27 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete - there are a handful of hits for him on Google Books as "Thomas Kroesbergen", but they are just listings. The party website gives a brief bio at, but with no independent sources offering any in-depth information, there's insufficient evidence of notability. Warofdreams talk 19:42, 27 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Weak delete -there is some mention but agree with warofdreams, there are no independent sources offering any in-depth information. Wikipedia would not be any poorer without including him in my view,,, Dr. Blofeld       White cat 15:50, 28 January 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.