Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tom Lee Osborn


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗ plicit  00:20, 1 April 2023 (UTC)

Tom Lee Osborn

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Hardly any significant coverage (won some trivial awards). Too early in career for a Wikipedia page. Please note that Christian Science Monitor is a syndicated article from TruthAtlas, sort of spam. Fails WP:SIGCOV. US-Verified (talk) 01:04, 19 March 2023 (UTC) Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 07:24, 26 March 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Environment-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 07:37, 19 March 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Kenya-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 07:37, 19 March 2023 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.


 * Delete per nomination. Doesn't meets WP:SIGCOV; coverage is WP:ROUTINE-based. Too early for an entry on encyclopedia like Wikipedia. Also, looks like WP:CV attempt. 102.217.120.102 (talk) 10:07, 31 March 2023 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.