Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tom Liston


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep.   A rbitrarily 0   ( talk ) 13:36, 16 May 2010 (UTC)

Tom Liston

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

Security consultant who does not meet WP:NOTABILITY. Only reference is self-published. Created by a sock of User:JohnBambenek, who has since been banned for sock-puppetry. Claritas (talk) 17:11, 9 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Speedy Delete - Notability issues ... and the sources don't cover the article.Onefinalstep (talk) 21:21, 9 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Just checking -- has the required wp:before search been done? Or is nom's statement as to the sources in the article only.--Epeefleche (talk) 07:38, 10 May 2010 (UTC)
 * I spent a reasonable time looking for significant coverage through thet web, but didn't find anything. Claritas (talk) 07:51, 10 May 2010 (UTC)
 * I'm thinking you didn't do a good search, then. Suggestion:  Try searching for the phrases "Tom Liston" and "security" in google news.  Then go to archives, and run the search there.  You will find more sources in archives ... and I just tossed a couple in from books.--Epeefleche (talk) 07:55, 10 May 2010 (UTC)


 * Speedy Keep. Per this, this, this, this, and this.  Lots of coverage, by many RSs.  We need to do better searches before nom'ing and voting, so as not to waste everyones' time or delete notable peoples' bios.--Epeefleche (talk) 08:07, 10 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions.  —Epeefleche (talk) 08:46, 10 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions.  -- Pcap  ping  08:58, 10 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Nomination withdrawn. Claritas (talk) 16:40, 10 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Many thanks.--Epeefleche (talk) 17:24, 10 May 2010 (UTC)


 * Keep Ample coverage.   D r e a m Focus  23:14, 10 May 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.