Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tom Maddison


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep. Nomination withdrawn. (non-admin closure) HawkAussie (talk) 00:41, 5 March 2020 (UTC)

Tom Maddison

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

I feel like this is tough one as it's shows that they made no appearance in the league competition but has in two cup competitions. The only thing that worries me is was these two appearances subs or actual starts as I can't access the archive without needing to pay.

Basically I feel like that this player might not pass WP:NFOOTY. HawkAussie (talk) 01:13, 28 February 2020 (UTC)
 * Comment - the concept of substitutes wasn't introduced into English football until the late 1960s, more than thirty years after this guy played -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 19:57, 28 February 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. HawkAussie (talk) 01:13, 28 February 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. HawkAussie (talk) 01:13, 28 February 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. HawkAussie (talk) 01:13, 28 February 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 01:27, 28 February 2020 (UTC)


 * Keep - meets NFOOTBALL. Needs improving, not deleting. GiantSnowman 19:40, 28 February 2020 (UTC)
 * Keep meets NFOOTBALL - also played for Nîmes - added reference. Nfitz (talk) 21:54, 29 February 2020 (UTC)
 * Withdraw nominaton HawkAussie (talk) 23:37, 2 March 2020 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.