Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tom Rockney (male model)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was Delete. —Quarl (talk) 2007-03-01 08:45Z 

Tom Rockney (male model)

 * Note: This nomination was part of a pattern of disruptive AFD nominations by . On the strength of the article, I have decided to leave this discussion open. Uncle G 17:33, 25 February 2007 (UTC)
 * – (View AfD) (View log)

May not meet WP:BIO in any way. Notability concerns. Spalberings 17:10, 25 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete unless sourced and referenced by end of this AfD Alf photoman 17:39, 25 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete - not notable per WP:BIO, no evidence of coverage in independent sources to establish notability. Article even admits he works in McDonald's most of the time, which suggests that multiple non-trivial coverage in third-party sources is unlikely to exist. Wal  ton  Vivat Regina!  19:48, 25 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete No external verification. I can't find anything about a Tom Rockney male model. Possible vanity page -- † Ðy§ep§ion † Speak your mind 20:05, 25 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete. Recreation of previously salted Tom rockney, no sources, no claims of notability.  He works at a McDonald's?  No notability there.  Corvus cornix 23:04, 25 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete This appears to be a joke/hoax article of some sort. I can find no third-party sources, or indeed, anything that assesses notability of the subject. This doesn't meet WP:BIO. --sunstar nettalk 23:27, 25 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Speedy Delete a rather obvious db-bio case. JuJube 06:05, 26 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete obviously non-notable unless multiple independent sources are added to the article to back up the modeling claims. Gwernol 12:46, 26 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete sources needed, also more info besides "worked in the field for 4 years".--Sar e kOfVulcan 17:07, 27 February 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.