Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tom Samek


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. Nomination withdrawn, with no "deletes" --  Phantom Steve / talk &#124; contribs \ 19:56, 24 May 2010 (UTC)

Tom Samek

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

Unsourced since 2007. No reliable sources of information found (most news hits seem to be about an American miner who led a strike) --  Phantom Steve / talk &#124; contribs \ 13:06, 10 May 2010 (UTC)  Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:03, 17 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Visual arts-related deletion discussions.  —--  Phantom Steve / talk &#124; contribs \ 13:11, 10 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep A quick search for "Tom Sameck" and "prints" turned up a number of sources. Most are short mentions, but do indicate a recurrence of coverage in articles about art in Tasmania. Significantly, he is included in a 100 year survey of state artists by the Tasmanian Museum and Art Gallery. Other sources: (and duplicate ) .  Ty  15:23, 10 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep per above...Modernist (talk) 23:08, 11 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.

 Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:03, 24 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.


 * Second relist rationale. The article is a BLP. --Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:04, 24 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep per the sources found and added by Ty. --Ron Ritzman (talk) 13:18, 24 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Withdrawal of AfD nomination I am satisfied with the references provided - good work - and so as there are no other "delete"s, I am closing this AfD as "Withdrawn" --  Phantom Steve / talk &#124; contribs \ 19:55, 24 May 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.